From eight modules.
To one system.
Most EPM tools sell you modules. NashOS gives you one system that operates as one — and the difference shows up in the close calendar, not the feature list.
From modules.
To a system.
Most EPM tools sell you modules. NashOS gives you one system that operates as one.
8 disconnected modules collapse into 5 unified systems.
No more handoffs between tools. One model, one source.
Collapse
Eight modules, eight copies of the truth.
Why a conventional EPM footprint makes every month begin with reconciliation.
A conventional EPM footprint spans eight modules: Planning, Close, Reporting, Scenarios, Data, Governance, Consolidation and Allocations. Each is licensed separately, configured separately, and — the part nobody puts on the datasheet — holds its own copy of the model. That is why a change to your chart of accounts is a project rather than an edit.
NashOS collapses that surface into five systems sharing one data foundation: Decision System, Continuous Planning, Data Foundation, Audit & Control, and Agentic Execution. One model, one set of dimensions, one computation path.
What you stop doing
- Reconciling the planning model against the reporting model
- Rebuilding scenarios after a dimension change
- Exporting to Excel to settle a number two systems disagree on
- Waiting on a consolidation run to see an entity roll-up
Compression
Five steps become three.
The old loop is five steps long: build the model, model the change, run the scenario, export the result, then rework it when someone finds a discrepancy. Elapsed time is measured in days and most of it is not analysis.
The NashOS loop is three. You ask, the system executes, and you review the draft and commit it. The model never leaves the system, so there is nothing to reconcile afterwards.
The request, step by step
- Ask — plain English, resolved against your real dimensions
- System executes — computation runs across every affected entity
- Draft → Commit — before/after shown, written only on confirmation
FAQ
About the architecture
What does “one data foundation” actually mean?▾
Entities, currencies, accounts, cost centres and every other dimension live in a single cube. Planning, reporting, consolidation and variance all read and write that one structure, so there is no synchronisation step and no possibility of two modules disagreeing about the same figure.
Do I have to migrate everything at once?▾
No. Pilots start by loading one period from one source and reconciling it against the report you already trust. Nothing else moves until that reconciles.
What happens when we change the chart of accounts?▾
Dimensions are file-driven, so a structural change is an edit rather than a rebuild. Dependent figures recompute from the same source; no scenario or report needs to be reconstructed.
Can we see how a number was produced?▾
Yes. Any figure drills through to the source rows behind it, and every write carries its before value, after value, actor and timestamp.
See it on your own close. Not a demo dataset.
Send one period of real data and we'll reconcile it against your existing report before we talk about anything else.