admin@nashos.ai
Built for finance leaders

Built for the way finance
actually works.

Same system, three lenses — each tuned to what your role needs to ship today. None of this is a separate product or a separate licence.

Built for finance leaders

Built for the way finance
actually works.

Same system, three lenses — each tuned to what your role needs to ship today.

C
CFO
Control + Audit

Board-ready numbers, fully audited — zero rebuilds.

audit_log · livetail -f
11:42:18COMMITforecast FY26 Q3 · admin
12:01:09INSERTdim_account · OPEX_RND
12:04:31INSERTscenario=WHATIF_Q3
12:06:18UPDATEREV_SAAS · +$2.1M
12:08:42COMMITforecast FY27 · admin
  • Full audit on every write
  • Defensible forecasts
  • Board-grade governance
Explore Nash for CFO
Most teams
F
FP&A
Continuous Planning

Planning as a continuous system — not a monthly cycle.

Scenario · Q3 hire pace
recompute · live
0 hires10 hires
Runway
12.8mo
Burn
$15.6M
EBITDA
−$1.1M
  • Scenarios update instantly
  • No model rebuilds
  • Driver-based multi-entity rollups
Try with your data
F
Founder
Real-time clarity

Know your runway instantly — no need to ask finance.

Current runway
live
14.2months+1.4 mo QoQ ↗
Cash$211M
Burn$14.8M/mo
  • Real-time clarity
  • Decisions in minutes
  • Self-serve burn + runway
Explore Nash for founders

Three seats

The same numbers, three questions.

CFO

The question a CFO gets asked in the board room is not “what is the number” but “where did it come from”. Every figure answers that without a follow-up email: the write that produced it, who made it, when, and what the value was before.

FP&A

Most FP&A time is spent rebuilding rather than analysing. Because drivers, entities and currencies share one computation path, a change to hire pace or price recomputes runway, burn and EBITDA in place — so the scenario conversation happens in the meeting rather than the week after it.

Founder

Runway is the number founders check most and wait for longest. Here it is computed from the same ledger finance uses, so a self-serve answer and the board deck cannot drift apart.

FAQ

Role-specific questions

Do we need a separate licence per role?

No. The three views are the same system, with what each person sees governed by their access. The pricing page sets out the three tiers and what each includes.

Can a founder see runway without touching the finance model?

Yes. Read access to computed figures such as cash, burn and runway is separate from the ability to draft or commit changes, so self-serve visibility does not create edit risk.

How do we stop analysts committing changes they shouldn't?

Today: no change is written without a user explicitly confirming it, and the audit trail records who confirmed it. A dedicated approval queue — where an analyst's draft waits for a separate approver — is on the near-term roadmap.

Will our auditors accept this?

Every write carries before value, after value, actor, timestamp and originating request, and reports drill through to source rows — which is the evidence chain an audit asks for. Confirm scope with your own auditor before relying on it for a specific standard.

Which seat are you in?

Tell us your role and we'll run the walkthrough from that lens rather than a generic tour.