Close software, reimagined as Continuous Finance.
Multi-entity, multi-currency consolidation with audit trail by construction — not a monthly fire drill. Continuous Finance means the close runs as a system rather than a deadline. NashOS collapses an 11-day month-end close to 1 day.
Where financial close automation actually saves the days
Most close-cycle pain isn't the journal entries. It's the 7 days of human reconciliation either side. Finance automation software earns its place by removing those days, not by adding dashboards.
Continuous reconciliation, not month-end sprint
Connectors run on schedule, not on a deadline. Trial balance lands in the cube on day 1 of close, not day 5. Reconciliation lives in queryable tables, not a Slack thread.
The variance pack, assembled from the cube
Top movers ranked by financial impact, not raw %. The pack is assembled from the cube instead of rebuilt in slides each period, so the 40-hour board pack collapses to 90 minutes. Auto-drafted, board-ready paragraph commentary is on the near-term roadmap.
Audit trail replaces version control
Every change has a who, when, before-after JSON, and reason. There's no 'wait, who changed the COGS assumption?' — it's a query. Pre-IPO ready on day one.
P&L · Balance Sheet · Cash Flow with full hierarchy
Drill from rollups to leaves. Multi-currency, multi-entity. CSV / Excel / PDF export from any view. Variance vs budget on every line.
Versus the alternatives
| Tool | Typical close | Time-to-live | Starting price |
|---|---|---|---|
| NashOS | 1 day | Hours, not months | On request |
| Excel + BI stack | 11–14 days | Already running | $0 + soul |
| Anaplan | 5–7 days | 6–9 months | $150k+ / yr |
| Workday Adaptive | 5–8 days | 3–6 months | $50k+ / yr |
| Oracle EPM | 7–9 days | 9–12 months | $200k+ / yr |
| Vena | 6–9 days | 3–5 months | $25k+ / yr |
Approximate ranges from public reviews + sales data. Your mileage will vary.
Common questions
What is financial close software?▾
Financial close software automates the month-end and quarter-end close. Financial close automation covers pulling trial balance from your ERP, reconciling across entities, generating P&L / Balance Sheet / Cash Flow, and assembling the variance pack for the board. NashOS adds an agentic AI layer that ranks the top movers, runs forecasts, and answers plain-English questions about the cube — cutting an 11-day close to 1.
How can I close my books faster?▾
CFO AI tools only help if they attack the right bottleneck. The 11-day close has three: (1) waiting for trial balance and reconciliation, (2) building the variance pack from scratch every period, (3) hand-writing commentary on the top movers. NashOS collapses each: continuous connectors land trial balance on day one, the agent ranks top movers by financial impact so commentary starts from a ranked list rather than a blank page (auto-drafted paragraphs are on the near-term roadmap), and the audit trail replaces the 'who changed what' Slack thread. Result: 1-day close cycle, 90-minute variance pack.
Is NashOS an alternative to Anaplan, Adaptive, or Oracle EPM?▾
Yes — NashOS is built for finance teams that want the planning + close + reporting capability of Anaplan or Workday Adaptive Planning without the $150k+ ACV and 6-month rollout. Implementation is days, not months. Pricing is quoted against your entity count, data volume and rollout pace. Side-by-side comparisons available at /vs/anaplan, /vs/adaptive, and /vs/excel.
Does it integrate with NetSuite or QuickBooks?▾
Today: REST APIs, SFTP, Excel, and CSV connectors are production-ready. Native NetSuite and QuickBooks connectors are on the near-term roadmap. Until those ship, NetSuite and QuickBooks customers connect via REST or scheduled CSV exports.
How long does finance automation software take to set up?▾
Hours, not months. Connect your trial balance (REST, SFTP, Excel, or CSV — or just paste it in), and the 9-dimension cube absorbs it. Most teams have a working Executive Summary the same day. A full driver-based plan with custom formulas is typically a 2-week onboarding with our team.
Are CFO AI tools safe? Can the agent auto-write to my financial data?▾
No auto-writes. Every chat-driven mutation produces a draft that the user must Post to commit. The backend re-validates the draft on commit. Audit trail captures actor, timestamp, and full before/after JSON for every change. The LLM never writes to the database directly — every tool call is server-side authenticated.
See it on your real numbers.
15-minute walkthrough on your trial balance. No slides, no sales script.